23 4 Contingencies

If some amount within the range of loss appears at the time to be a better estimate than any other amount within the range, that amount shall be accrued. When no amount within the range is a better estimate than any other amount, however, the minimum amount in the range should be accrued. In situations where no single amount within a range of possible outcomes is more likely, the expected value method can be used. This involves calculating a weighted average of all possible outcomes based on their probabilities.

If a reasonable estimate cannot be made, the contingency cannot be recognized as a liability, although it should still be disclosed if it is at least reasonably possible that a loss has been incurred. Not surprisingly, many companies contend that future adverse effects from all loss contingencies are only reasonably possible so that no actual amounts are reported. Practical application of official accounting standards is not always theoretically pure, especially when the guidelines are nebulous. FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 450, Contingencies, details the proper accounting treatment for loss contingencies and gain contingencies. Except for tax loss carryforwards, companies don’t record gain contingencies. They disclose them only if there’s a high possibility that they will indeed come to fruition.

Why is a Contingent Liability Recorded?

Adjustments to the provision would be made as new evidence emerges, with increases treated as expenses in profit or loss. We cover defining contingent liabilities and assets, provision examples, types of contingencies, as well as summary checklists. These references provide a solid foundation for understanding the principles and practical applications of accounting for contingencies under GAAP, ensuring accurate and transparent financial reporting. When no single outcome within a range of potential outcomes is more likely than any other, GAAP provides guidance on how to handle the situation. In such cases, the minimum amount within the range should be recorded, and the range should be disclosed. When there is a single most likely outcome for the contingency, that amount should be recorded.

Real-World Examples of Contingencies

• Do not make a retroactive adjustment to an earlier period to record a loss contingency.
• It could also be determined by the potential future, known financial outcome.
• Except for tax loss carryforwards, companies don’t record gain contingencies.
• As a general guideline, the impact of contingent liabilities on cash flow should be incorporated in a financial model if the probability of the contingent liability turning into an actual liability is greater than 50%.

They estimate the potential legal settlement to be between $1 million and $2 million– with the most likely settlement amount being $1.25 million. In this case, the company should record a contingent liability on the books in the amount of $1.25 million. An automotive company revises its estimate of warranty costs based on new data indicating a higher defect rate than previously estimated. The company originally estimated warranty costs at $500,000 but now estimates them at $750,000. A manufacturing company has been identified as a potentially responsible party for environmental contamination at one of its sites. The company engages environmental experts to estimate the cleanup costs, which range from $10 million to $20 million, with $15 million being the most likely amount.

Loss Contingencies

DTTL (also referred to as “Deloitte Global”) does not provide services to clients. In the United States, Deloitte refers to one or more of the US member firms of DTTL, their related entities that operate using the “Deloitte” name in the United States and their respective affiliates. Certain services may not be available to attest clients under the rules and regulations of public accounting. High-level summaries of emerging issues and trends related to the accounting and financial reporting topics addressed in our Roadmap series, bringing the latest developments into focus.

IAS 37, Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets, states that the amount recorded should be the best estimate of the expenditure that would be required to settle the present obligation at the balance sheet date. That is the best estimate of the amount that an entity would rationally pay to settle the obligation at the balance sheet date or to transfer it to a third party. Under U.S. GAAP, if there is a range of possible losses but no best estimate exists within that range, the entity records the low end of the range. That is a subtle difference in wording, but it is one that could have a significant impact on financial reporting for organizations where expected losses exist within a very wide range. The information is still of importance to decision makers because future cash payments will be required. However, events have not reached the point where all the characteristics of a liability are present.

Four Potential Treatments for Contingent Liabilities

Even though a reasonable estimate is the company’s best guess, it should not be a frivolous number. For a financial figure to be reasonably estimated, contingency in accounting it could be based on past experience or industry standards (see Figure 12.9). It could also be determined by the potential future, known financial outcome.

The $4.3 billion liability for Volkswagen related to its 2015 emissions scandal is one such contingent liability example. The accounting of contingent liabilities is a very subjective topic and requires sound professional judgment. Contingent liabilities can be a tricky concept for a company’s management, as well as for investors. Judicious use of a wide variety of techniques for the valuation of liabilities and risk weighting may be required in large companies with multiple lines of business.

• High-level summaries of emerging issues and trends related to the accounting and financial reporting topics addressed in our Roadmap series, bringing the latest developments into focus.
• If the expected settlement date is within the upcoming year, the liability would be classified under the short-term liability section of the balance sheet.
• Since the company has a three-year warranty, and it estimated repair costs of $5,000 for the goals sold in 2019, there is still a balance of $2,200 left from the original $5,000.
• The information is still of importance to decision makers because future cash payments will be required.

The goal is to provide a reasonable and supportable estimate that faithfully represents the potential liability or gain. So, if it is probable the settlement of the contingency will result in a gain, the entity should probably go ahead and record that gain on the income statement, right? Contingent assets are not recognized, but they are disclosed when it is more likely than not that an inflow of benefits will occur.

Examples to Illustrate Recognition Criteria

If the most likely amount is unknown, but there is a reasonably estimated range, then it is acceptable to use the range and apply the minimum limit of the range. Similarly, the knowledge of a contingent liability can influence the decision of creditors considering lending capital to a company. The contingent liability may arise and negatively impact the ability of the company to repay its debt. When determining if the contingent liability should be recognized, there are four potential treatments to consider. If these criteria are met, the contingency should be recognized on the balance sheet as a provision. Similarly, the guidance in ASC 460 on accounting for guarantee liabilities, which has existed for two decades, is often difficult to apply because the determination of whether an arrangement constitutes a guarantee is complex.

By following these best practices, entities can enhance the reliability and credibility of their financial statements, ensuring that they provide a clear and accurate representation of potential financial risks and opportunities. This proactive approach not only supports compliance with GAAP but also fosters a culture of transparency and accountability in financial reporting. A company manufacturing electronic devices offers a one-year warranty on its products. Based on historical data, the company estimates that 3% of products sold will require repair or replacement under the warranty, with an average cost of $150 per unit. Subsequent events are events that occur after the balance sheet date but before the financial statements are issued or available to be issued.

The key is to recognize provisions only when stringent recognition criteria are met, while disclosing details of material contingencies even if no provision is recognized. This enables users to assess the potential impact of contingencies on the company’s financial position. The key difference between provisions and contingencies is that provisions are recorded as liabilities, while contingencies are not recorded, but may need to be disclosed. Determining whether a future obligation should be accounted for as a provision or contingency requires judgment in assessing the probability and reliability of measurement of any potential outflows. This article provides a comprehensive guide to accounting for contingencies and provisions under IAS 37. You will learn the key concepts, recognition criteria, measurement approaches, and disclosure requirements.